Go Tokyo Your Experience
The motto often mentioned in interpersonal communication isGood gathering and good dispersalHowever, recently there has been a controversy in the Japanese fan fiction community about “it’s easy to gather but not to disperse”, which has sparked widespread discussion among netizens. The cause of the incident was that a doujinshi artist felt angry when he discovered that a part of his doujinshi work he collaborated with last year had been completely redrawn by his partner without authorization.
What made her even more annoyed was that the other party made these changes without informing her and used the word ‘add pen correction’ as if the work had been created by the other party from beginning to end. What is the inside story behind this? Next, let’s explore together.
[Announcement] A netizen informed me that in the collaborative doujinshi “Lost Paradise” between Herman and Alva, which I released in September 2023, Miss Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa), who was working with me at the time, posted a version of me partially redrawn on her personal website
The collaborator Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa) posted on his personal website the content of last year’s collaborative doujinshiAdd pen correction versionHowever,Add pen correctionThe term usually refers to the more detailed visual adjustments and revisions made by manga artists when publishing single volume works, or the re editing done by doujinshi creators when re publishing collections. This type of modification is usually done by the original author themselves, rather than altering someone else’s work. Yoshida did not inform the original author of this behavior at allAITherefore, it is questioned whether this can be calledAdd pen correctionOr should it be classified as’ theft ‘?
After verification, not only have the pages I shared been completely redrawn in this part of ‘Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland’, but also any parts that involve me have not been spared. We were once partners who worked together for the doujinshi project for more than a year, and I never thought I would be treated like this. This makes me feel extremely disappointed
AII compared my original work with the manga redrawn by Yoshida:
AIContinuing to elaborate, as they ended their collaboration shortly after the release of the doujinshi, and did not contact each other again, she was unaware of Yoshida’s publication of the manga on her personal website and its redrawing until informed by netizens.
Half of this collaborative doujinshi is the result of my hard work. Every tiny detail is the result of my repeated deliberation and modification, and I often sacrifice sleep in the process. I never expected my own work to be trampled upon like this. This made me realize for the first time that there are still people who can modify others’ works without permission, claiming that this is just ‘adding strokes and corrections’
I have now completely cut off contact with her, and she has also blocked my account, leaving me completely unaware of this matter. As a creator, I cannot believe that such a thing could happen
Quickly, the public opinion storm triggered by this incident sent Yoshida to a hot topic, and she quickly deleted all online traces to appease the anger of the internet.
After being criticized, Yoshida deleted her personal website and X account.
It seems to be realized in reality Good gathering and good dispersalIt’s not that simple.
The motto often mentioned in interpersonal communication isGood gathering and good dispersalHowever, recently there has been a controversy in the Japanese fan fiction community about “it’s easy to gather but not to disperse”, which has sparked widespread discussion among netizens. The cause of the incident was that a doujinshi artist felt angry when he discovered that a part of his doujinshi work he collaborated with last year had been completely redrawn by his partner without authorization.
What made her even more annoyed was that the other party made these changes without informing her and used the word ‘add pen correction’ as if the work had been created by the other party from beginning to end. What is the inside story behind this? Next, let’s explore together.
[Announcement] A netizen informed me that in the collaborative doujinshi “Lost Paradise” between Herman and Alva, which I released in September 2023, Miss Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa), who was working with me at the time, posted a version of me partially redrawn on her personal website
The collaborator Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa) posted on his personal website the content of last year’s collaborative doujinshiAdd pen correction versionHowever,Add pen correctionThe term usually refers to the more detailed visual adjustments and revisions made by manga artists when publishing single volume works, or the re editing done by doujinshi creators when re publishing collections. This type of modification is usually done by the original author themselves, rather than altering someone else’s work. Yoshida did not inform the original author of this behavior at allAITherefore, it is questioned whether this can be calledAdd pen correctionOr should it be classified as’ theft ‘?
After verification, not only have the pages I shared been completely redrawn in this part of ‘Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland’, but also any parts that involve me have not been spared. We were once partners who worked together for the doujinshi project for more than a year, and I never thought I would be treated like this. This makes me feel extremely disappointed
AII compared my original work with the manga redrawn by Yoshida:
AIContinuing to elaborate, as they ended their collaboration shortly after the release of the doujinshi, and did not contact each other again, she was unaware of Yoshida’s publication of the manga on her personal website and its redrawing until informed by netizens.
Half of this collaborative doujinshi is the result of my hard work. Every tiny detail is the result of my repeated deliberation and modification, and I often sacrifice sleep in the process. I never expected my own work to be trampled upon like this. This made me realize for the first time that there are still people who can modify others’ works without permission, claiming that this is just ‘adding strokes and corrections’
I have now completely cut off contact with her, and she has also blocked my account, leaving me completely unaware of this matter. As a creator, I cannot believe that such a thing could happen
Quickly, the public opinion storm triggered by this incident sent Yoshida to a hot topic, and she quickly deleted all online traces to appease the anger of the internet.
After being criticized, Yoshida deleted her personal website and X account.
It seems to be realized in reality Good gathering and good dispersalIt’s not that simple.
The motto often mentioned in interpersonal communication isGood gathering and good dispersalHowever, recently there has been a controversy in the Japanese fan fiction community about “it’s easy to gather but not to disperse”, which has sparked widespread discussion among netizens. The cause of the incident was that a doujinshi artist felt angry when he discovered that a part of his doujinshi work he collaborated with last year had been completely redrawn by his partner without authorization.
What made her even more annoyed was that the other party made these changes without informing her and used the word ‘add pen correction’ as if the work had been created by the other party from beginning to end. What is the inside story behind this? Next, let’s explore together.
[Announcement] A netizen informed me that in the collaborative doujinshi “Lost Paradise” between Herman and Alva, which I released in September 2023, Miss Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa), who was working with me at the time, posted a version of me partially redrawn on her personal website
The collaborator Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa) posted on his personal website the content of last year’s collaborative doujinshiAdd pen correction versionHowever,Add pen correctionThe term usually refers to the more detailed visual adjustments and revisions made by manga artists when publishing single volume works, or the re editing done by doujinshi creators when re publishing collections. This type of modification is usually done by the original author themselves, rather than altering someone else’s work. Yoshida did not inform the original author of this behavior at allAITherefore, it is questioned whether this can be calledAdd pen correctionOr should it be classified as’ theft ‘?
After verification, not only have the pages I shared been completely redrawn in this part of ‘Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland’, but also any parts that involve me have not been spared. We were once partners who worked together for the doujinshi project for more than a year, and I never thought I would be treated like this. This makes me feel extremely disappointed
AII compared my original work with the manga redrawn by Yoshida:
AIContinuing to elaborate, as they ended their collaboration shortly after the release of the doujinshi, and did not contact each other again, she was unaware of Yoshida’s publication of the manga on her personal website and its redrawing until informed by netizens.
Half of this collaborative doujinshi is the result of my hard work. Every tiny detail is the result of my repeated deliberation and modification, and I often sacrifice sleep in the process. I never expected my own work to be trampled upon like this. This made me realize for the first time that there are still people who can modify others’ works without permission, claiming that this is just ‘adding strokes and corrections’
I have now completely cut off contact with her, and she has also blocked my account, leaving me completely unaware of this matter. As a creator, I cannot believe that such a thing could happen
Quickly, the public opinion storm triggered by this incident sent Yoshida to a hot topic, and she quickly deleted all online traces to appease the anger of the internet.
After being criticized, Yoshida deleted her personal website and X account.
It seems to be realized in reality Good gathering and good dispersalIt’s not that simple.
The motto often mentioned in interpersonal communication isGood gathering and good dispersalHowever, recently there has been a controversy in the Japanese fan fiction community about “it’s easy to gather but not to disperse”, which has sparked widespread discussion among netizens. The cause of the incident was that a doujinshi artist felt angry when he discovered that a part of his doujinshi work he collaborated with last year had been completely redrawn by his partner without authorization.
What made her even more annoyed was that the other party made these changes without informing her and used the word ‘add pen correction’ as if the work had been created by the other party from beginning to end. What is the inside story behind this? Next, let’s explore together.
[Announcement] A netizen informed me that in the collaborative doujinshi “Lost Paradise” between Herman and Alva, which I released in September 2023, Miss Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa), who was working with me at the time, posted a version of me partially redrawn on her personal website
The collaborator Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa) posted on his personal website the content of last year’s collaborative doujinshiAdd pen correction versionHowever,Add pen correctionThe term usually refers to the more detailed visual adjustments and revisions made by manga artists when publishing single volume works, or the re editing done by doujinshi creators when re publishing collections. This type of modification is usually done by the original author themselves, rather than altering someone else’s work. Yoshida did not inform the original author of this behavior at allAITherefore, it is questioned whether this can be calledAdd pen correctionOr should it be classified as’ theft ‘?
After verification, not only have the pages I shared been completely redrawn in this part of ‘Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland’, but also any parts that involve me have not been spared. We were once partners who worked together for the doujinshi project for more than a year, and I never thought I would be treated like this. This makes me feel extremely disappointed
AII compared my original work with the manga redrawn by Yoshida:
AIContinuing to elaborate, as they ended their collaboration shortly after the release of the doujinshi, and did not contact each other again, she was unaware of Yoshida’s publication of the manga on her personal website and its redrawing until informed by netizens.
Half of this collaborative doujinshi is the result of my hard work. Every tiny detail is the result of my repeated deliberation and modification, and I often sacrifice sleep in the process. I never expected my own work to be trampled upon like this. This made me realize for the first time that there are still people who can modify others’ works without permission, claiming that this is just ‘adding strokes and corrections’
I have now completely cut off contact with her, and she has also blocked my account, leaving me completely unaware of this matter. As a creator, I cannot believe that such a thing could happen
Quickly, the public opinion storm triggered by this incident sent Yoshida to a hot topic, and she quickly deleted all online traces to appease the anger of the internet.
After being criticized, Yoshida deleted her personal website and X account.
It seems to be realized in reality Good gathering and good dispersalIt’s not that simple.
The motto often mentioned in interpersonal communication isGood gathering and good dispersalHowever, recently there has been a controversy in the Japanese fan fiction community about “it’s easy to gather but not to disperse”, which has sparked widespread discussion among netizens. The cause of the incident was that a doujinshi artist felt angry when he discovered that a part of his doujinshi work he collaborated with last year had been completely redrawn by his partner without authorization.
What made her even more annoyed was that the other party made these changes without informing her and used the word ‘add pen correction’ as if the work had been created by the other party from beginning to end. What is the inside story behind this? Next, let’s explore together.
[Announcement] A netizen informed me that in the collaborative doujinshi “Lost Paradise” between Herman and Alva, which I released in September 2023, Miss Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa), who was working with me at the time, posted a version of me partially redrawn on her personal website
The collaborator Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa) posted on his personal website the content of last year’s collaborative doujinshiAdd pen correction versionHowever,Add pen correctionThe term usually refers to the more detailed visual adjustments and revisions made by manga artists when publishing single volume works, or the re editing done by doujinshi creators when re publishing collections. This type of modification is usually done by the original author themselves, rather than altering someone else’s work. Yoshida did not inform the original author of this behavior at allAITherefore, it is questioned whether this can be calledAdd pen correctionOr should it be classified as’ theft ‘?
After verification, not only have the pages I shared been completely redrawn in this part of ‘Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland’, but also any parts that involve me have not been spared. We were once partners who worked together for the doujinshi project for more than a year, and I never thought I would be treated like this. This makes me feel extremely disappointed
AII compared my original work with the manga redrawn by Yoshida:
AIContinuing to elaborate, as they ended their collaboration shortly after the release of the doujinshi, and did not contact each other again, she was unaware of Yoshida’s publication of the manga on her personal website and its redrawing until informed by netizens.
Half of this collaborative doujinshi is the result of my hard work. Every tiny detail is the result of my repeated deliberation and modification, and I often sacrifice sleep in the process. I never expected my own work to be trampled upon like this. This made me realize for the first time that there are still people who can modify others’ works without permission, claiming that this is just ‘adding strokes and corrections’
I have now completely cut off contact with her, and she has also blocked my account, leaving me completely unaware of this matter. As a creator, I cannot believe that such a thing could happen
Quickly, the public opinion storm triggered by this incident sent Yoshida to a hot topic, and she quickly deleted all online traces to appease the anger of the internet.
After being criticized, Yoshida deleted her personal website and X account.
It seems to be realized in reality Good gathering and good dispersalIt’s not that simple.
The motto often mentioned in interpersonal communication isGood gathering and good dispersalHowever, recently there has been a controversy in the Japanese fan fiction community about “it’s easy to gather but not to disperse”, which has sparked widespread discussion among netizens. The cause of the incident was that a doujinshi artist felt angry when he discovered that a part of his doujinshi work he collaborated with last year had been completely redrawn by his partner without authorization.
What made her even more annoyed was that the other party made these changes without informing her and used the word ‘add pen correction’ as if the work had been created by the other party from beginning to end. What is the inside story behind this? Next, let’s explore together.
[Announcement] A netizen informed me that in the collaborative doujinshi “Lost Paradise” between Herman and Alva, which I released in September 2023, Miss Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa), who was working with me at the time, posted a version of me partially redrawn on her personal website
The collaborator Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa) posted on his personal website the content of last year’s collaborative doujinshiAdd pen correction versionHowever,Add pen correctionThe term usually refers to the more detailed visual adjustments and revisions made by manga artists when publishing single volume works, or the re editing done by doujinshi creators when re publishing collections. This type of modification is usually done by the original author themselves, rather than altering someone else’s work. Yoshida did not inform the original author of this behavior at allAITherefore, it is questioned whether this can be calledAdd pen correctionOr should it be classified as’ theft ‘?
After verification, not only have the pages I shared been completely redrawn in this part of ‘Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland’, but also any parts that involve me have not been spared. We were once partners who worked together for the doujinshi project for more than a year, and I never thought I would be treated like this. This makes me feel extremely disappointed
AII compared my original work with the manga redrawn by Yoshida:
AIContinuing to elaborate, as they ended their collaboration shortly after the release of the doujinshi, and did not contact each other again, she was unaware of Yoshida’s publication of the manga on her personal website and its redrawing until informed by netizens.
Half of this collaborative doujinshi is the result of my hard work. Every tiny detail is the result of my repeated deliberation and modification, and I often sacrifice sleep in the process. I never expected my own work to be trampled upon like this. This made me realize for the first time that there are still people who can modify others’ works without permission, claiming that this is just ‘adding strokes and corrections’
I have now completely cut off contact with her, and she has also blocked my account, leaving me completely unaware of this matter. As a creator, I cannot believe that such a thing could happen
Quickly, the public opinion storm triggered by this incident sent Yoshida to a hot topic, and she quickly deleted all online traces to appease the anger of the internet.
After being criticized, Yoshida deleted her personal website and X account.
It seems to be realized in reality Good gathering and good dispersalIt’s not that simple.
The motto often mentioned in interpersonal communication isGood gathering and good dispersalHowever, recently there has been a controversy in the Japanese fan fiction community about “it’s easy to gather but not to disperse”, which has sparked widespread discussion among netizens. The cause of the incident was that a doujinshi artist felt angry when he discovered that a part of his doujinshi work he collaborated with last year had been completely redrawn by his partner without authorization.
What made her even more annoyed was that the other party made these changes without informing her and used the word ‘add pen correction’ as if the work had been created by the other party from beginning to end. What is the inside story behind this? Next, let’s explore together.
[Announcement] A netizen informed me that in the collaborative doujinshi “Lost Paradise” between Herman and Alva, which I released in September 2023, Miss Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa), who was working with me at the time, posted a version of me partially redrawn on her personal website
The collaborator Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa) posted on his personal website the content of last year’s collaborative doujinshiAdd pen correction versionHowever,Add pen correctionThe term usually refers to the more detailed visual adjustments and revisions made by manga artists when publishing single volume works, or the re editing done by doujinshi creators when re publishing collections. This type of modification is usually done by the original author themselves, rather than altering someone else’s work. Yoshida did not inform the original author of this behavior at allAITherefore, it is questioned whether this can be calledAdd pen correctionOr should it be classified as’ theft ‘?
After verification, not only have the pages I shared been completely redrawn in this part of ‘Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland’, but also any parts that involve me have not been spared. We were once partners who worked together for the doujinshi project for more than a year, and I never thought I would be treated like this. This makes me feel extremely disappointed
AII compared my original work with the manga redrawn by Yoshida:
AIContinuing to elaborate, as they ended their collaboration shortly after the release of the doujinshi, and did not contact each other again, she was unaware of Yoshida’s publication of the manga on her personal website and its redrawing until informed by netizens.
Half of this collaborative doujinshi is the result of my hard work. Every tiny detail is the result of my repeated deliberation and modification, and I often sacrifice sleep in the process. I never expected my own work to be trampled upon like this. This made me realize for the first time that there are still people who can modify others’ works without permission, claiming that this is just ‘adding strokes and corrections’
I have now completely cut off contact with her, and she has also blocked my account, leaving me completely unaware of this matter. As a creator, I cannot believe that such a thing could happen
Quickly, the public opinion storm triggered by this incident sent Yoshida to a hot topic, and she quickly deleted all online traces to appease the anger of the internet.
After being criticized, Yoshida deleted her personal website and X account.
It seems to be realized in reality Good gathering and good dispersalIt’s not that simple.
The motto often mentioned in interpersonal communication isGood gathering and good dispersalHowever, recently there has been a controversy in the Japanese fan fiction community about “it’s easy to gather but not to disperse”, which has sparked widespread discussion among netizens. The cause of the incident was that a doujinshi artist felt angry when he discovered that a part of his doujinshi work he collaborated with last year had been completely redrawn by his partner without authorization.
What made her even more annoyed was that the other party made these changes without informing her and used the word ‘add pen correction’ as if the work had been created by the other party from beginning to end. What is the inside story behind this? Next, let’s explore together.
[Announcement] A netizen informed me that in the collaborative doujinshi “Lost Paradise” between Herman and Alva, which I released in September 2023, Miss Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa), who was working with me at the time, posted a version of me partially redrawn on her personal website
The collaborator Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa) posted on his personal website the content of last year’s collaborative doujinshiAdd pen correction versionHowever,Add pen correctionThe term usually refers to the more detailed visual adjustments and revisions made by manga artists when publishing single volume works, or the re editing done by doujinshi creators when re publishing collections. This type of modification is usually done by the original author themselves, rather than altering someone else’s work. Yoshida did not inform the original author of this behavior at allAITherefore, it is questioned whether this can be calledAdd pen correctionOr should it be classified as’ theft ‘?
After verification, not only have the pages I shared been completely redrawn in this part of ‘Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland’, but also any parts that involve me have not been spared. We were once partners who worked together for the doujinshi project for more than a year, and I never thought I would be treated like this. This makes me feel extremely disappointed
AII compared my original work with the manga redrawn by Yoshida:
AIContinuing to elaborate, as they ended their collaboration shortly after the release of the doujinshi, and did not contact each other again, she was unaware of Yoshida’s publication of the manga on her personal website and its redrawing until informed by netizens.
Half of this collaborative doujinshi is the result of my hard work. Every tiny detail is the result of my repeated deliberation and modification, and I often sacrifice sleep in the process. I never expected my own work to be trampled upon like this. This made me realize for the first time that there are still people who can modify others’ works without permission, claiming that this is just ‘adding strokes and corrections’
I have now completely cut off contact with her, and she has also blocked my account, leaving me completely unaware of this matter. As a creator, I cannot believe that such a thing could happen
Quickly, the public opinion storm triggered by this incident sent Yoshida to a hot topic, and she quickly deleted all online traces to appease the anger of the internet.
After being criticized, Yoshida deleted her personal website and X account.
It seems to be realized in reality Good gathering and good dispersalIt’s not that simple.
The motto often mentioned in interpersonal communication isGood gathering and good dispersalHowever, recently there has been a controversy in the Japanese fan fiction community about “it’s easy to gather but not to disperse”, which has sparked widespread discussion among netizens. The cause of the incident was that a doujinshi artist felt angry when he discovered that a part of his doujinshi work he collaborated with last year had been completely redrawn by his partner without authorization.
What made her even more annoyed was that the other party made these changes without informing her and used the word ‘add pen correction’ as if the work had been created by the other party from beginning to end. What is the inside story behind this? Next, let’s explore together.
[Announcement] A netizen informed me that in the collaborative doujinshi “Lost Paradise” between Herman and Alva, which I released in September 2023, Miss Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa), who was working with me at the time, posted a version of me partially redrawn on her personal website
The collaborator Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa) posted on his personal website the content of last year’s collaborative doujinshiAdd pen correction versionHowever,Add pen correctionThe term usually refers to the more detailed visual adjustments and revisions made by manga artists when publishing single volume works, or the re editing done by doujinshi creators when re publishing collections. This type of modification is usually done by the original author themselves, rather than altering someone else’s work. Yoshida did not inform the original author of this behavior at allAITherefore, it is questioned whether this can be calledAdd pen correctionOr should it be classified as’ theft ‘?
After verification, not only have the pages I shared been completely redrawn in this part of ‘Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland’, but also any parts that involve me have not been spared. We were once partners who worked together for the doujinshi project for more than a year, and I never thought I would be treated like this. This makes me feel extremely disappointed
AII compared my original work with the manga redrawn by Yoshida:
AIContinuing to elaborate, as they ended their collaboration shortly after the release of the doujinshi, and did not contact each other again, she was unaware of Yoshida’s publication of the manga on her personal website and its redrawing until informed by netizens.
Half of this collaborative doujinshi is the result of my hard work. Every tiny detail is the result of my repeated deliberation and modification, and I often sacrifice sleep in the process. I never expected my own work to be trampled upon like this. This made me realize for the first time that there are still people who can modify others’ works without permission, claiming that this is just ‘adding strokes and corrections’
I have now completely cut off contact with her, and she has also blocked my account, leaving me completely unaware of this matter. As a creator, I cannot believe that such a thing could happen
Quickly, the public opinion storm triggered by this incident sent Yoshida to a hot topic, and she quickly deleted all online traces to appease the anger of the internet.
After being criticized, Yoshida deleted her personal website and X account.
It seems to be realized in reality Good gathering and good dispersalIt’s not that simple.
The motto often mentioned in interpersonal communication isGood gathering and good dispersalHowever, recently there has been a controversy in the Japanese fan fiction community about “it’s easy to gather but not to disperse”, which has sparked widespread discussion among netizens. The cause of the incident was that a doujinshi artist felt angry when he discovered that a part of his doujinshi work he collaborated with last year had been completely redrawn by his partner without authorization.
What made her even more annoyed was that the other party made these changes without informing her and used the word ‘add pen correction’ as if the work had been created by the other party from beginning to end. What is the inside story behind this? Next, let’s explore together.
[Announcement] A netizen informed me that in the collaborative doujinshi “Lost Paradise” between Herman and Alva, which I released in September 2023, Miss Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa), who was working with me at the time, posted a version of me partially redrawn on her personal website
The collaborator Yoshida (formerly known as Yamakawa) posted on his personal website the content of last year’s collaborative doujinshiAdd pen correction versionHowever,Add pen correctionThe term usually refers to the more detailed visual adjustments and revisions made by manga artists when publishing single volume works, or the re editing done by doujinshi creators when re publishing collections. This type of modification is usually done by the original author themselves, rather than altering someone else’s work. Yoshida did not inform the original author of this behavior at allAITherefore, it is questioned whether this can be calledAdd pen correctionOr should it be classified as’ theft ‘?
After verification, not only have the pages I shared been completely redrawn in this part of ‘Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland’, but also any parts that involve me have not been spared. We were once partners who worked together for the doujinshi project for more than a year, and I never thought I would be treated like this. This makes me feel extremely disappointed
AII compared my original work with the manga redrawn by Yoshida:
AIContinuing to elaborate, as they ended their collaboration shortly after the release of the doujinshi, and did not contact each other again, she was unaware of Yoshida’s publication of the manga on her personal website and its redrawing until informed by netizens.
Half of this collaborative doujinshi is the result of my hard work. Every tiny detail is the result of my repeated deliberation and modification, and I often sacrifice sleep in the process. I never expected my own work to be trampled upon like this. This made me realize for the first time that there are still people who can modify others’ works without permission, claiming that this is just ‘adding strokes and corrections’
I have now completely cut off contact with her, and she has also blocked my account, leaving me completely unaware of this matter. As a creator, I cannot believe that such a thing could happen
Quickly, the public opinion storm triggered by this incident sent Yoshida to a hot topic, and she quickly deleted all online traces to appease the anger of the internet.
After being criticized, Yoshida deleted her personal website and X account.
It seems to be realized in reality Good gathering and good dispersalIt’s not that simple.